• Українська
  • English
  • Русский
ISSN 2415-3400 (Online)
ISSN 1028-821X (Print)

WAVE PROPAGATION THROUGH A WAVEGUIDE SEGMENT WITH RANDOMLY CORRUGATED WALLS: DUAL NATURE OF THE LOCALIZATION

Tarasov, YV, Shostenko, LD
Organization: 

O. Ya. Usikov Institute for Radiophysics and Electronics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
12, Proskura st., Kharkov, 61085, Ukraine
E-mail: yutarasov@ire.kharkov.ua

https://doi.org/10.15407/rej2015.01.003
Language: Russian
Abstract: 

A theory of wave propagation in waveguides incorporating a finite-length segment with randomly corrugated side boundaries is developed. We have shown that the dominant role in the waveguide state formation is played by the so-called gradient scattering mechanism, which is associated with surface asperity sharpness but not with their amplitude. The corrugated portion of the waveguide may be regarded as the modulated potential barrier, whose width is coincident with the length of the corrugated region whereas the height is determined by the corrugation sharpness. There are two possible types of wave localization in such a system. The first one manifests itself through the sharpness-induced mode cut-off which leads to rarefication of the entire (combined) waveguide spectrum, so that at some critical level of the asperity sharpness the waveguide becomes the evanescent-mode one. The other type of localization is a localization of Anderson nature. It is associated with multiple scattering of waves by random fluctuations of the effective potential. We have predicted a jump of the full transmittance of the waveguide at its transition to single-mode regime due to the mode cut-off. This phenomenon is associated with the absence of the inter-mode scattering in the single-mode regime.

Keywords: gradient scattering, multimode waveguide, randomly rough boundaries, wave localization

Manuscript submitted 17.09.2014
PACS 68.49.-h; 71.30.+h; 72.20.Ee; 73.63.Nm
Radiofiz. elektron. 2015, 20(1): 3-12
Full text (PDF)

References: 
  1. Nguyen, B. P., Kim, K., 2012. Anomalously suppressed localization in the two-channel Anderson model. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 24(13), pp. 135303 (6 p.).
  2. Sapienza, L., Thyrrestrup, H., Stobbe, S., Garcia, P. D., Smolka, S., Lodahl, P., 2010. Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics with Anderson-Localized Modes. Science. 327(5971), pp. 1352–1355.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185080
  3. Timp, G., Baranger, H. U., de Vegvar, P., Cunningham, J. E., Howard, R. E., Behringer, R. and Mankiewich, P. M., 1988. Propagation around a Bend in a Multichannel Electron Waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60(20), pp. 2081–2084.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.2081
  4. Makarov, N. M., Tarasov, Yu. V., 2001. Electron localization in narrow surface-corrugated conducting channels: Manifestation of competing scattering mechanisms. Phys. Rev. B. 64(23), pp. 235306 (14 p.).
  5. Makarov N. M., Tarasov, Yu. V., 1998. Conductance of a single-mode electron waveguide with statistically identical rough boundaries. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 10(7), pp. 1523–1538.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/10/7/006
  6. Tarasov, Yu. V., 2000. Elastic scattering as a cause of quantum de-phasing: the conductance of two-dimensional imperfect con-ductors. Waves Random Media. 10(4), pp. 395–415.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0959-7174/10/4/301
  7. Goryashko, V. O., Tarasov, Yu. V., Shostenko, L. D., 2013. The sharpness-induced mode stopping and spectrum rarefication in waveguides with periodically corrugated walls. Waves in Random and Complex Media. 23(2), pp. 89–113.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2013.774510
  8. Lifshits, I. M., Gredeskul, S. A., Pastur, L. A., 1982. Introduction to the theory of disordered structures. Мoscow: Nauka Publ. (in Russian).
  9. Courant, R., Hilbert, D., 1953. Methods of Mathematical Physics. Vol. 1. N. Y.: Interscience Publ., Inc.
  10. Zwanzig, R., 1992. Diffusion past an entropy barrier. J. Phys. Chem. 96(10), pp. 3926–3930.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/j100189a004
  11. Douglas Stone, S., Szafer, A., 1988. What is measured when you measure a resistance?––The Landauer formula revisited. IBM J. Res. Develop. 32(3), pp. 384–413.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.323.0384